FUNDAMENTALS
OF FRAUD
by:
DEFINITION OF FRAUD
Fraud is defined as illegal acts that
are characterized by deceit, concealment or violation of trust. These acts are
not dependent upon the application of threat of violence or of physical force.
Individuals and organizations to obtain money; property or services; to avoid
payment of loss of services; or to secure personal or business advantage
perpetrate frauds.
Internal Fraud
Internal frauds are the illegal acts of employees against the
company. This is different from external frauds, which are perpetrated by
customers against the entity.
FRAUD STATISTICS
In the
Financial crimes pay more than other
crimes. Average losses for such crimes are as follows:
PROFILE OF FRAUD OFFENDERS
Fraud offenders differ little from the
"average" person. According to studies, most offenders commit fraud
because the following three elements occur simultaneously:
Unsharable Financial Pressure
Unsharable financial pressure is
usually caused by an immediate need that is difficult to share with others.
Examples of these pressures might include:
Other pressures, which are not
necessarily financial in nature, might include:
Perceived
Rationalization
Fraud offenders rationalize their
behavior as something other than fraud or theft. Common rationalizations might
include:
LEGAL ELEMENTS OF FRAUD
Definition
Black’s Law Dictionary defines fraud as: "...All multifarious
means which human ingenuity can devise, and which are resorted to by one
individual to get advantage over another by false suggestions or suppression of
the truth, and includes all surprise, trick, cunning, or dissembling, and any
unfair way by which another is cheated."
Elements of Fraud
Elements of Corruption
Bribery
Illegal
Gratuity
An illegal
gratuity is a lesser-included offense of bribery. It is an extra "thank
you," or "reward" payment to an official for performing normal
duties. Therefore, an illegal gratuity does not require proof of an intent to
influence.
Commercial
Bribery
Things of
value may include:
Conflict of
Interest
A conflict of
interest, which causes actual or potential economic loss to the principal, may
be prosecuted criminally or civilly as a fraud. A disloyal agent is liable for
any losses caused as a result of the conflict and must pay over any profits
that he or she earned, even if no loss to the principal resulted.
CRIMINAL VERSUS CIVIL FRAUD
Intent
Wrongful intent, or "guilty
knowledge," must normally be proved in civil and criminal fraud cases.
There are numerous ways of proving intent, such as:
Burden of Proof
In criminal cases, the burden of proof
is beyond a reasonable doubt, that is, juries must rule unanimously on
guilt.
In civil litigation, the standard of
proof is much lower and may be decided by merely a "preponderance" of
evidence. The verdict also does not necessarily have to be unanimous.
CLASSIFICATION OF FRAUDS
The methodology, the type of
concealment, or the elements can classify frauds. Methodology includes at what
point of occurrence the fraud takes place, the victim, and the type of
organization involved.
Points of Occurrence
Assets can be misappropriated at three
separate and distinct points in an enterprise:
Before
Reaching the Entity
Examples of
this type would be theft of receipts at the point of sale, as well as theft of
inventory before it is booked.
Within
the Entity
All
illustration would include theft of petty cash after it has been recorded on
the books.
After
Leaving The Entity
Examples
would include the conversation of phony vendor payments and ghost employees.
Type of Victim
The type of victim can classify frauds.
There are four major victim categories:
Shareholders
Shareholders
are most often victims of management frauds, whereby managers attempt to
falsely inflate profits or assets.
Investors
Investors are
victims of scams perpetrated by fraud artists. Examples of schemes might
include Ponzi schemes or advanced fee swindles.
Enterprises
Both
commercial and governmental organizations are victims of two types of fraud:
Theft or
misappropriation by officers and employees. Examples include embezzlement and
kickbacks.
Customers
(and in the case of governmental agencies, taxpayers) attempting to defraud the
entity. Examples include checks artists, phony insurance claims, and fraud in
government benefit programs.
Customers
Business
enterprises frequently victimize their customers through false advertising,
product substitution, and related schemes.
Type of Concealment
Business or internal frauds can be
classified by the way they are concealed.
On-book
Frauds
Principally,
an On-book fraud is one that occurs within the business. Illicit
payments or activities are recorded, generally in some disguised manner, in the
regular books and records of the company. An audit trail (however obscure)
normally exists which might aid in the detection of an On-book fraud. Examples might
include payments to a phony vendor generated by fictitious charges to travel,
entertainment, or other miscellaneous accounts.
On-book
frauds are normally detected at the point of payment. For example, if a payment
is made to a fictitious vendor, examining the addresses of all vendors might
discover the fraud. The address for a fictitious vendor may match up with
either a post office box or an employee’s address. If either of these events
occur, the auditor should consider the possibility of an On-book fraud.
Off-book
Frauds
Off-book
frauds normally occur outside
the accounting mainstream, and no audit trail is likely to exist. Generally,
for an Off-book fraud to occur, the company usually has unrecorded vendor
rebates or significant cash sales. Examples of Off-book frauds include bribery
and kickbacks.
Off-book frauds
are typically proved at the point of receipt; that is, the initial "red
flag" will appear with regard to the receipt of illicit funds. For
example, if an employee has suddenly purchased a new car and a new home, but
the employee’s salary has not changed, then one might concluded that the
employee has received wealth from an outside source. If there is no logical
explanation for the increased wealth, and irregularities are suspected, further
investigation may be recommended to determine the source of the possible
outside income.
Generally,
Off-book frauds are larger in amounts than On-book frauds.
ELEMENTS OF FRAUD
Unlike some crimes, fraud normally
involves three steps. (Auditing efforts should concentrate on the step easiest
to prove or detect.)
Act
The fraud act
is normally the theft. In a simple example, the theft of petty cash would
constitute the act.
Concealment
Once the act
has been accomplished, efforts must be made by the perpetrator to conceal it.
In the case of the theft of cash, falsifying the balance in the cash account
would constitute concealment.
Conversion
Once assets
are misappropriated, and that fact is concealed, the perpetrator must convert
these assets to his or her own benefit. In the case of the theft of petty cash,
conversion would occur when the perpetrator deposited the funds in an account,
or made a purchase with the ill-gotten gains.
DETECTING FRAUD
There are numerous proactive methods to
detecting fraud other than fraud auditing. Once fraud is suspected, it should
be documented and investigated. These investigations include interviews,
surveillance (observation), investigative audits, record searches, and net
worth analyses. Proactive methods include:
Complaints
and Tips
Complaints by
customers, employees and others frequently lead to suspects in fraud cases.
Entities should encourage communication that leads to possible investigation.
Behavior
Changes
Fraud
perpetrators often undergo personality changes as a result of the continuous
pressure of committing fraud. Having management and employees observe changes
in behavior can lead to suspects.
Lifestyle
Changes
Fraud
perpetrators rarely hoard the proceeds of their acts. Instead, they frequently
spend conspicuously on lavish luxury items such as automobiles, homes, clothing
and jewelry.
Internal
Control Weakness
Weaknesses in
internal control are a major contributing factor to the opportunity to commit
fraud. Weaknesses that lead to fraud are usually fundamental in nature; such
as, the failure to properly segregate the functions of record keeping,
authorization and custody over assets.